This second model I am presenting to you now, of the early Staggerwing machines produced by Beechcraft , denominated A17SF, was conceived to participate in the MacRobertson race as NR / NC12569. Several circumstances did not permit that to happen, and the plane was eventually sold to the Bureau of Air Commerce as NS68.
But first, the differences with the model I previously made and posted –the first
17R, NC499N, that you can see here:
and this version,
the A17SF, whose characteristics are:
-a much bigger cowl to house the Wright Cyclone
-absence of ventilation gills on the fuselage front
-the presence of landing flaps underneath the upper wing *
* this in turn demanded a cut on the “tail” of the wing
strut upper fairings. DO NOT follow Wylam plans regarding this –and other-
details, they help, but get stuff wrong all the time; look at photos instead
(or besides)
-a non-divided rudder –a divided one was used as an airbrake
in the former model- that also has a small compensator protruding ahead from
the hinge line at the top
-steerable tailwheel
-different nav lights located on the lower wings (as in the series
models)
-some sort of intake tube on left wing root –but only on
NS68, not on the racer-
-two Venturis underneath the belly –only on racer-
-carb intake on top of cowl
-thin struts instead of wire rigging on tail feathers
-presence of antenna wire -on NS68-
-different Pitot tube
-different landing wires rigging
-elevators had also small compensators protruding from the
hinge line
-antenna loop on the cabin roof
Now, to this particular model of the Stag, A17FS.
This particular version had the most powerful engine and the
stumpiest look of them all.
The schemes differ slightly too between the two incarnations of A17FS:
-of course different registrations
-scalloped-painted pants in the racer
-different propellers
-the wing struts were red on NS68 and silver on NR/NC12569
-the regs on the tail are red on NS68 and silver on NC12569
(besides of course the obvious facts that the regs themselves were different)
As said, you could visit the previous build to see the
captioned building sequence, having in mind that there were, as said, many
differences; therefore you must consult references if attempting conversions to any of
these versions.
I will repeat here the warnings I posted on the other conversion:
The two things that gave me A LOT of headaches and produced
A LOT of frustration were the two-part windshield and the struts. The struts as
molded have tiny locating protrusions which you are at risk to confuse with the
leftovers of the gates, a couple millimeters apart. If you have managed to spot
that with a “phew!”, you are not off the hook. The curve of the upper part of
the strut will not match that of the upper wing which it supports, nor will the
little pip align with the faint hole in the said wing. Good luck with that. I
did not have any.
Here mistakenly I made a split rudder, which I later corrected, since this version has a normal one:
Pins again for the wing panels:
And more pins for the tail feathers:
Pants in place:
Side by side:
A different tailwheel arrangement:
Calculating the passing of wires through the wing:
The different cowl visible here with air intake:
Some painting in progress:
The two different props:
Printing of decals for both versions:
Painting underway:
More masking:
This time I did remember to make and apply the masks on the wing for the regs:
And more pins for the tail feathers:
Pants in place:
Side by side:
A different tailwheel arrangement:
Calculating the passing of wires through the wing:
The different cowl visible here with air intake:
Some painting in progress:
The two different props:
Printing of decals for both versions:
Painting underway:
More masking:
This time I did remember to make and apply the masks on the wing for the regs:
No comments:
Post a Comment