(Photos from the SDASM photostream)
(The completed models are here:
Short wing:
https://wingsofintent.blogspot.com/2023/08/hughes-h-1-1935-speed-record-breaker.html
Long wing:
https://wingsofintent.blogspot.com/2023/08/hughes-h-1-1937-intercontinental-record.html
What could anybody say about Howard Hughes, especially when one is not Howard Hughes. It's likely we all have heard about him, the good and the bad. I think that a mix of those would do as an approximation to the truth. Putting the persona aside, there is no doubt that he left a powerful and deep imprint in many aspects of aviation and in any case I tend to like him better than the shady weasel that was Juan Trippe. I respect Hughes also because he was a pilot, and a good one, besides having chutzpah. Now, I could also make a long list of reasons for me to call him other things, much less flattering. Be that as it may... he conquered many records and won many trophies, among them, in 1935 and 1937, the world air speed record and a "transcontinental" speed record (in fact a Los Angeles-New Jersey flight across the US) with the planes represented here, the short-wing and long-wing Hughes H-1, respectively (they are, actually, one and the same plane, now in the NASM). The engine used was a supped-up Pratt & Whitney Twin Wasp Junior.
CMR has produced some time ago this nice double kit in resin (again, this was one plane, so a "side by side" posing would be strange). I owe the pleasure of this build to friend and fellow modeler Andrew Nickeas, who gifted me this kit, so thanks Andrew! The kit is somewhat less precise and detailed (to my eyes) than the CMR's Boeing Model 40 I built relatively recently and than their Sikorsky S.39 and S.38, that I have also built. It feels comfortably above a, let's say, Planet kit, but not among CMR's bests. Nonetheless, there is interior detail -to some extent, and the engine has separate exhausts and the cowl-to-engine fastening frame is there too. The engine, that some reviewers at the time of its release defined as "well detailed", today we would call it fair, having been superseded by much better detailed aftermarket offerings. Again, to some extent, the landing gear has some detail. The decals look ok, final judgment at the moment of their application.
No parts came broke, which is almost a miracle with this type of kit's bagging, but there are a number of pinholes (not too many) which is common in this older generation resin kits, but unfortunately all four prop blades were affected at the tips, with some little crumbling. Some recesses (like parts of the landing gear wells) had to be cleaned up of resin blobs an excrescences, no big deal. Wherever thin webs were present they were cleaned up uneventfully. In removing the parts from their castings again nothing broke, but extricating some of them required care and patience. Three of the four fuselage halves came bananized, and went to the Turkish Baths/Sauna to be put straight. No photoetched fret or masks are provided, but you get two sets of canopy spares, something always much welcome. Be sure to inspect and match the parts that correspond to the two versions before starting to build. Speaking of CMR, their civil Short S.23 is something I would have liked to build, but the price range is above what I spend in a kit (not that it isn't worth it).
The instructions consist of several sheets with a number of photos to show the detail in the original plane. The photos are not printed at the best quality or size, but give a good idea, a better idea will be had after an Internet search as there are many photos online of the plane at the NASM and contemporary photos. The assembly drawings are comfortably big (a first ever!) and generally clear, with a couple spots with the usual vagueness. The vacuformed transparencies (as said, with a spare each) are not the clearest I have seen, but are usable after a bath in clear acrylic. The models can be built OOB to good effect, but also little improvements could be made here and there. The surfaces in the original were absolutely smooth, as flush riveting was used and the wood wings were covered in plywood. The control surfaces on the other hand were fabric-covered and doped, which resulted in a less reflective/whitish aluminium hue than the rest of the metallic structure.
Contents:
A clear view of the parts as they come:
The wings are perhaps the parts that will require more effort and care to separate from their casting blocks:
The props depict the original one in general shape and detail (which is something to say, as a number of kits don't even bother), but lack finesse. I think I will make new ones, also considering the pinholes and small crumbling they suffered:
Some base colors are airbrushed:
One thing is becoming clear: unless you represent the engine uncovered or partially uncovered (as done in a beautiful rendition of this kit by Piotr Dmitruk), the mass of intake and exhaust pipes provided are most likely a waste of time as they are not seen at all, and the fit of all those parts may present issues when trying to lodge the whole lot into the aft part of the cowl. Much better to install short sections of metal tube between the cowl and the nose once everything is in place. The kit's fuselage nose, by the way, needs a few exhausts pipes of its own, which are missing.
The kit's props are given the bolts on the hub visible in photos (here applied as long stems, then trimmed back once set) and a "nut" at the end of the axle:
Engines are painted, instrument panels are given aftermarket decal instruments:
Pages from Popular Mechanics:
Both wings are drilled for the Pitot position:
The transparencies as explained are not the clearest:Bear in mind two things: the windshield -that is, the forward section of the canopy- slid forward on three narrow rails. The rest of the clear covering consisted of two sections, parted in the middle at the apex, that slid into "pouches" at the sides of the cockpit. This considered, the fore section should not be "blended" with the fuselage as we normally do, but rest on it (not too proud, though, and for this some careful sanding from inside of the contact area on the windshield may be necessary).
Painting continues, again with base colors. In the background one of the canopies that was trimmed and given an acrylic bath. I may separate the windshield as most models that appear online has done, which seems like the most practical approach. The thickness of the "lip" of the windshield that goes over the fuselage will be a delicate point, as was foreseen. The props, according to photos, have two thirds of the back of the blades in anti-glare black. The front of the cowl "birdcage" is not a comfortable fit over the engine gearbox, and may brake if forced over it too much. It's of course a bit overscale, but a nice detail. Replace it with thin wire? food for thought:
By the way, I just realized that the counterweights on the kit's prop are on the opposite side of where they should be. They can be easily removed, new discs punched and located in their proper positions:
The photo and the primer revealed pitted surfaces that have to be corrected:
With all the interior ready to go in, guess what? It was found that neither instrument panel nor cockpit pan would fit. There are so many new mistakes to be made, why 99% of kit manufacturers make this one, over, and over and over again? And we are not talking here about a swift pass with the sanding stick, but to shave several millimeters from already painted and detailed parts! Well, as they say: Frustration is the Mother of...who frigging cares! Make it right, please, not in your manufacturer's minds, but on the real parts! Do you realize that the fuselage sides have thickness, don't you?
More painting:
My props are ready and have the HS logos applied. The kit props need yet further reworking as explained. The two fuselages are closed, with some effort it must me said. Work to fill the blemishes on the LG legs continues (third pass). The wheels are ready and have received photoetched metal hubs to match photos.
We Volga-on:
The kit's two props have their counterweights removed; new ones are made and placed on the right position:
The fit of both sets of wings to their respective fuselages needed careful adjustment, removing material hare and there to get things more or less in place. Epoxy is the way to go here. The stabilizers will need metal pining, as they have no locating devices. Once again I am surprised by the vague and imprecise fit that doesn't resemble at all other good CMR kits:
The engine will have to be sanded around to go deeper into the aft cowl section. And here is how to tackle a surprise before it becomes a surprise: the aft cylindrical "stalk" of the engine (that is supposed to be glued to the fuselage front, iiac), needs shortening until the cowl "mounts" a bit onto the fuselage (there is a line), so position of the engine inside the cowl and distance to the fuselage are of course interdependent, and should be set correctly. Otherwise, once again, when all is beautifully assembled and painted...it won't fit. So that was your warning:
Pinning the horizontal tail:
Tail on in the short wing model:
And here is the horizontal tail for the long wing model, with "differential" hinge line:
The other side is much better... so you know which one to put facing upwards:
Both tails on. The roots, molded on the fuselage, were narrower in chord than the stabs. I had to first sand them making the contact area more flat, taking a smidgen off the material for the sizes to match:
A coat of primer reveals some blemishes that need correction. The kit's props are finally completed after reworking them, but I will use as explained the ones I made. The LG legs are ready for paint, and the ancillary elements of the landing gear completed, as well as the front of the cowls:
A couple of things regarding the kit´s cockpit opening. As you can see below, the kit got the "cut" all the way around. Those flanges protruding in the photo and sketch are, as it was mentioned before, the canopy sides that slide into a pouch on the fuselage sides. Another small alteration should be done if using the full canopy, namely add a frame (actually two narrow ones in contact) as the sides meet on the top. If only using the windshield, it is seen in photos sliding forward (it did that on three very thin furrows), so bear in mind that. The fit is not good, and some carving is needed:
The kit doesn't represent the leather guards at the front of the opening or the side pads. These could be modeled from Milliput or similar.
After consider different painting strategies, I opted to paint the whole models gloss blue, then mask the wings, and apply the metal color as I usually do -over a gloss black base, but blue in this case. A few hues of blue were considered, and finally Model Masters Ford and GM Engine Blue was used, I believe to good effect. The paint is actually darker than the sample chips you see online, which is good, as it matches photos of the plane in the Smithsonian well:
With the noses the procedure was -as explained- to coordinate the length of the engine "stalk" in its back -which gives the distance to the firewall- and the depth it will go into the aft section of the cowl, pressed in, if you will, by the fore section of the cowl that cages the engine front. Once all is measured and dry-fitted, the engine is trapped between the two pars of the cowl as these are glued together. Then a mask is applied to the "open" area of the front, and the back is filled with damp paper towel pieces. The cowl is given a gloss base in preparation for the metal color. The blue outside of the legs has been masked and the metal color applied to the lowest section. One windshield has been masked and painted as a trial:More convoluted masking ensues, to be able to paint the tail control surfaces a duller white aluminium dope top match photos:
Once this is done, and although the light at the end of the tunnel seems close, there is a long list of to-dos yet to be dealt with. A thin area at front section of the fuselage has to be painted a darker metal color. Then adding the landing gear, Pitot, rudder counterweight, missing coaming and padding to the cockpit front, add the missing exhaust stacks to the right side on the nose, the windshield, decals, a wire antenna to the transcontinental plane, painting the wheel wells wood and metal, etc.:
Now that darker metal area at the front is done:
Engine and cowl are glued. The three exhaust stacks that come from inside the nose are added. Wheel bays painted:
The LG legs receive some rivets as they are very prominent in photos, as well as the brake lines. Fuel and oil caps are printed as decals. I wasn't very happy with the trials of the windshield, a bit thick in the lip (I tried to sand it down but it doesn't really follow the fuselage curvature tightly, so I made others from clear plastic. There is no magic solution here as the "lip" doesn't blend with the fuselage as usual, being as explained above a separate part that slides forth and back. The frame at the bottom takes the shape of little triangles that follow a different curvature over the fuselage. So I will use whatever I can make fit best:LG main parts on:
Rudder counterweight, coaming and pads on, as well as the Pitot. The short wing version had a forked probe, while the long wing had a plain tube:
Remember when I said that the decals looked ok? Well, I retract my hasty words, they are crap:
The yellow registrations not only fall apart, but the ink is translucent, and the hue of the yellow instead of being solid and bright is a muddy ocher. Nothing like completing the build and having your work ruined by crappy decals. There is a signature on the sheet that reads "Stanislav Mach", perhaps the decal maker.
After much prodding trying to get the pieces together, I ended up having to remove the low-quality and inaccurate color decals and commissioning a replacement set from a reputable decal-maker. Sigh...
So here they are, completed but waiting for the (good) wing registrations:
The Artic Decals replacements providing accuracy, solid color and right hue arrived, and they are applied:
(The completed models are here:
Short wing:
https://wingsofintent.blogspot.com/2023/08/hughes-h-1-1935-speed-record-breaker.html
Long wing:
https://wingsofintent.blogspot.com/2023/08/hughes-h-1-1937-intercontinental-record.html
I will be watching this build with great interest; for one reason, it;s such a beautiful beast, and for the other, I had this kit, and sold the short-winged one to a modeling buddy and kept the short-winged one. I have been up close and personal to the real H-1 at the NASM, and as you have stated, it had two sets of wings and the NASM got them both when the H-1 was shipped to the museum in a custom made crate! The story of its re-assembly by the NASM makes for extremely interesting reading.
ReplyDeleteLet me see: so you sold the short wing but kept the short wing. This is a feat for the annals of modelling trade! I am confused enough as it is, dealing with two almost identical kits at the same time!
DeleteBrain fade! I kept the long winged kit and sold the short winged one! I really need to proof my replies BEFORE hitting submit! This old Mk 1 brain is not what it used to be!
DeleteUn hermoso avión, son de las cosas que no logro entender de como ningún fabricante mainstream no lo haya producido, en realidad lo que se encuentra en kit es una sobre oferta de un puñado de aviones......y la novedad es otro Mustang otro Me-109 o un Phantom.
ReplyDelete10.000 % de acuerdo, Alain!
DeleteConsulta técnica, no es conveniente en aviones de terminación metálica muy pulidos usar metal foil o papel de cocina? o ya hoy en día la pinturas están a un nivel que no vale la pena semejante tarea.
ReplyDeleteUna buena terminación con pintura es en general en aspecto mejor que una terminación en foil, muchísimo más rapida y además tiene la ventaja de la variación tonal. El foil, como todo en el hobby, tiene su lugar creo, por ejemplo usado en un DC-3 vetusto (si uno tiene la paciencia y la habilidad, si no queda como un chocolate mal envuelto en el protector metalizado).
DeleteClaudio, retiro mis dudas sobre la pintura vs metal foil quedo realmente muy muy bien, las calcas siempre son una ruleta rusa, pero bueno saldra a tu auxilio artic decals, consulta cuanto sale una hoja de calcas por enargo?
ReplyDeleteBueno, las malas calcas son una ruleta rusa con todas las balas, no con una. Mejor charlamos sobre los encargos de calcas directamente, via email.
DeleteBueno a esperar las fotos, por suerte pudiste solucionar rapido el tema calcas.
ReplyDelete